Internalised Ableism
a teaching sheet.
Whose standards are shaping how I judge myself?
A ready-to-use session on internalised ableism, for trainers, lecturers and supervisors.
Length: 60 minutes.
Suits: Any level; pairs well with CBT, ACT or person-centred teaching.
Built from: Internalised Ableism.
Reuse: free to teach from, with credit.
The short version
Internalised ableism is what happens when a culture’s judgements about disability become a person’s own voice: rest must be earned, support is weakness, worth depends on productivity. Therapy can help trace where a belief was learned and what it costs, without turning it into one more thing a disabled person is doing wrong.
Learning outcomes
By the end of the session, participants should be able to:
- Name common absorbed messages and where they come from.
- Distinguish internalised ableism from grief, accurate perception or simple preference.
- Practise tracing a belief to its source without pathologising the client.
Download this session
- Slides for this session (PowerPoint, with speaker notes)
- Participant worksheet (Word, editable)
To make a PDF, open the file and save it as PDF. Shared under CC BY-NC 4.0, with an extra permission to teach from it on fee-paying courses.
Before the session
- Participants need: no prior reading.
- You need: this sheet. The Internalised Ableism page has more depth if you want it.
- Preparation time: about 45 minutes the first time.
- Materials: the case, the worked example and the worksheet below, shared in advance in accessible formats.
Key ideas
- Common messages: needing help means weakness; productivity determines worth; success means overcoming disability.
- The concept draws on disability studies, including Campbell’s work on internalised ableism (Campbell, 2008).
- Not everything hard about being disabled is internalised ableism. Sometimes it is just hard.
- Psychotherapy is not culturally neutral and can reproduce the same standards.
- The task is examining where a belief came from and what it costs, not compulsory positivity.
Full background: Internalised Ableism.
A session plan
Our frameworkA suggested 60-minute outline. Adapt timings to your group. Say at the start that people can take a break or step out whenever they need to, and add a planned break if the group needs one.
- Opening (10 minutes): ask the group to list messages about rest, help and productivity that they picked up in training or at work.
- Input (15 minutes): the key ideas above.
- Activity (20 minutes): the case below, in small groups.
- Discussion (10 minutes): the questions below.
- Close (5 minutes): one change each person will try in practice.
Activity: Tracing the voice
Fictional teaching example
Fionn, 23, is autistic and says he has to “earn” rest by finishing every task first. In small groups: identify the message, ask where it might have been learned, consider whether any of it is accurate or simply preference, and draft one question that traces rather than corrects.
Worked example: what Fionn’s rule might mean
Our frameworkFionn says he has to “earn” rest by finishing every task first. Before deciding it’s internalised ableism, hold several possible meanings open:
- Rest feels morally undeserved.
- Unfinished tasks cause real, practical anxiety.
- Earlier criticism shaped a rigid rule.
- Finishing a task is genuinely satisfying for him.
- Several of these at once.
An open first question: “What happens for you if you rest before everything is finished?” That is more open than asking straight away who taught him an ableist belief.
What happens for you if you rest before everything is finished?
I can’t switch off. And I hear my old manager saying I’m not pulling my weight.
So there’s a feeling of not switching off, and there’s a voice. Can we look at each of those?
Facilitator commentary. The therapist separates two things Fionn said, without naming either as ableism, and without replacing his rule with a rule about self-care or pride. If the old manager’s voice turns out to carry a message about disability and worth, that is where internalised ableism can be explored. That would come from Fionn’s account, not from the therapist’s theory.
Facilitator notes: likely answers
Our framework| If a group says… | You might respond… |
|---|---|
| “It’s internalised ableism.” | It might be. What else could it be? What would Fionn say? |
| “He should learn to rest.” | That’s a new rule. What happens if we explore the old one first? |
| “Autistic people often like finishing things.” | Some do. Is that true for Fionn? Ask rather than assume either way. |
What good looks like
- holds more than one meaning open;
- starts with an open question;
- doesn’t name the belief for him;
- doesn’t replace one rule with another.
Participant worksheet: tracing the voice
- What is the message in Fionn’s rule?
- List at least three things it might mean.
- Write one opening question that traces rather than corrects.
- What would make you think internalised ableism is part of this?
- What would you avoid saying?
Discussion questions
- Which of these messages do you recognise from your own training culture?
- How would you tell internalised ableism apart from an accurate reading of how others behave?
- What is the risk of naming internalised ableism too quickly?
- How might meeting other disabled people change these beliefs?
Work here, pause, change direction
Our framework| Work here | Pause and ask | Change direction if… |
|---|---|---|
| Exploring shame linked to needing support | Is “shame” the client’s word? | you’re imposing an internalised-ableism explanation |
| Exploring fear of being excluded | What exclusion has actually happened? | there are real barriers to address before questioning the fear |
| Questioning a harsh rule | Does the rule do anything useful for them? | you’re swapping it for a rule of your own |
Difficult moments
Our frameworkShort responses for moments that often come up in this kind of session.
| If this happens | Try this |
|---|---|
| “We can’t accommodate every possible need.” | Name the barrier in front of you, the learning or clinical aim, the alternatives that exist, and who can authorise a change. |
| “Everyone has difficulties.” | Agree, then come back to this specific barrier and its unequal effects. |
| A participant shares a harmful experience | Thank them. Offer a choice to carry on, pause, or talk privately afterwards. Don’t turn their story into the case study. |
| Someone asks a participant to speak for disabled people | Redirect the question to the material, and say that no one here represents a group. |
| Someone equates needing support with being less competent | Ask which professional competence is in question, and how it is actually being assessed. |
| You get something wrong | Name the assumption, correct it, and say what you will change. |
Don’t ask disabled participants to argue for whether their own access needs are legitimate.
Common misunderstandings
- “The goal is for the client to feel proud.” The goal is to examine, not to require a feeling.
- “If a client is struggling, it must be internalised.” Sometimes it is the world.
After the session
- Follow-up: each participant writes down one belief about rest or help they picked up in training, and where it came from.
- Review: next session, ask how it shows up in their work with clients.
Running the session accessibly
- Share materials in advance, in accessible formats, and use captions for any video.
- Build in breaks, and allow people to take part by speaking, writing or listening.
- Assume some participants are disabled. Don’t ask anyone to disclose, or to speak for disabled people as a group.
- Agree how personal material will be handled before the activity.
Evidence & sources
Sources checked in October 2026, using targeted searches rather than a systematic review. “We have not located” means our searches did not find it.
Established theory
Campbell, F. A. K. (2008), “Exploring internalised ableism using critical race theory”, Disability & Society, 23(2), 151–162. doi:10.1080/09687590701841190.
Established theory
Oliver, M. (1990), The Politics of Disablement. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
Our framework
The session plan, activity and discussion questions are this site’s own teaching material, built from the source page.
Fictional example
The person in the activity is constructed for learning. They are not a real person.
Reuse
This sheet is shared under CC BY-NC 4.0. An extra permission also allows teaching from it on fee-paying courses. See Reusing This Material.
Last reviewed: October 2026.
How to cite this page: Donaghey, C. (2026). Internalised Ableism: Teaching Sheet. Disability in Psychotherapy. Available at: https://disabilityinpsychotherapy.online/for-trainers-and-course-leaders/internalised-ableism/ (Accessed: [date]).
Shared under CC BY-NC 4.0, with an extra permission to teach from it on fee-paying courses. Credit the site. See Reusing This Material.