FOR THERAPISTS

Start
here.

What changes in my approach when disability is in the room?

One practice point from each approach, with a two-minute starting box on every hub.

Read in 60 seconds

What this is: a quick way into the site for busy therapists.

How to use it: find your approach, then open its hub’s starting box.

Time needed: two minutes per approach.

One thing to take away: check for a practical or bodily explanation before a psychological one.

The short version

This page gives you one practice point from each approach on the site, so you can find your own approach quickly and see what changes when disability is in the room. Each approach’s hub also has a two-minute “For therapists: start here” box with five practice points, something to try in your next session, and a link to the evidence.

One point from each approach

Three readings to begin

  1. Mine, Yours, Ours, System: the site’s core formulation tool, for working out where a difficulty sits before deciding what it means.
  2. Assessment Bias and Diagnostic Overshadowing: how disability can lead to new difficulties being misread, or missed.
  3. Access Is Part of the Therapy: why communication, energy, format and pace belong inside the work.

One tool to use this week

The between-sessions worksheet

Six questions to bring to supervision or use after a session: what happened in the client’s words, your first interpretation, what supports and challenges it, what might belong to each of the four places, what the client thinks you’re missing, and what you’ll do differently. Open the worksheet

From noticing to review: one example

Fictional teaching example

Tiarnán is 44 and has lupus, a condition whose fatigue and pain come and go. He has cancelled three of his first six sessions, usually on the day.

Tiarnán is a fictional teaching example, not a real person.

1

Noticing

The therapist notices the pattern of late cancellations and a flatness in the sessions Tiarnán does attend.

2

First interpretation

The therapist’s first thought is ambivalence about therapy. They hold this as one possibility, not a conclusion.

3

Asking together

They ask, without assuming: what tends to be happening on the days he cancels? Tiarnán says that by four o’clock, after work, he is often exhausted, and on flare days he can’t face travelling. He hadn’t mentioned it because he didn’t want to seem unreliable.

4

Agreeing an adaptation

They move to morning video sessions of 40 minutes, with the option of switching to a phone call on a bad day, and no charge for cancelling during a flare.

5

Reviewing

Six weeks later, Tiarnán has attended five of six sessions, missing one during a flare. The sessions feel less flat. Over time, he also says that one topic, his relationship with his father, is something he had been glad to avoid. Both explanations turned out to be partly true. Reviewing together let them see which was which.

The point isn’t that cancellations always mean fatigue. It’s that checking for a practical or bodily explanation, and reviewing what changes, lets the therapy find out.

Across every approach

Our framework

How to cite this page: Donaghey, C. (2026). For Therapists: Start Here. Disability in Psychotherapy. Available at: https://disabilityinpsychotherapy.online/for-therapists/start-here/ (Accessed: [date]).

Shared under CC BY-NC 4.0, with an extra permission to teach from it on fee-paying courses. Credit the site. See Reusing This Material.